Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 12:42:33 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compile_et & mk_cmds? Message-ID: <199607011842.MAA10492@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <9607011827.AA09845@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> References: <199607010418.WAA08199@rocky.mt.sri.com> <9607011827.AA09845@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Could compile_et be moved to eBones, > > Erm, why? It's a general-purpose utility/library, used by many libraries > developed at MIT. Is it used at all by FreeBSD? > > and what is the purpose of mk_cmds? > > It generates a command table for the `subsystem' library (libss), for > which the same comment applies. I would like to replace it with > something a little more modern (probably tcl), but this will take some > time and work that I'm not prepared to spend right now. Is it used by *anything* in FreeBSD? If not, why do we have it? We recently moved out libforms since it wasn't used, so the same arguement should apply to libss. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607011842.MAA10492>