Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Sep 1997 10:48:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Bill Pechter <pechter@lakewood.com>
To:        softweyr@xmission.com (Wes Peters)
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 'uname -m' not alpha? (was Re: 'uname -m' not i586?)
Message-ID:  <199709041448.KAA08282@i4got.lakewood.com>
In-Reply-To: <199709040204.UAA13569@obie.softweyr.ml.org> from Wes Peters at "Sep 3, 97 08:04:13 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, Wes Peters wrote:
> Doug White writes:
>  > The `machine' identifies the architecture under which the kernel is
>  > designed to run under.  Since FreeBSD is designed to run under the Intel
>  > i386 architecture (386 and compatible processors) it will report 'i386.'
>  > This is also used to define machine-dependent code in the kernel to
>  > compile, ie there is a /usr/src/sys/i386 heirarchy.  In the future DEC
>  > Alpha port there will be a machine type `alpha' in addition to `i386.'
> 
> Hmm... Does anyone know what Digital UNIX (nee OSF/1) reports as the
> architecture for this machine?  I suspect it is probably "axp", and
> contend we should probably mimic the DEC system if it's not too big a
> change at this point.
> 
> For those who remember when DEC ruled the world of minicomputers, AXP
> has a nice "callback."  Rumor has it, when DEC applied for a trademark
> on "Alpha" and was told they couldn't trademark it, the "AXP" moniker
> was brought up by some of the old-timers on the hardware side.  Why
> "AXP?"  It stands for (according to the scuttlebutt) "Almost eXactly
> Prism."  I'll leave it up to Bill Pechter to explain what Prism was.
> 
I wish I could -- but I can't.  I'll crosspost to comp.sys.dec to see if 
there's any answer.


Well, the story is Prism was a multiprocessor Risc system built at DEC's
research facility that was killed by DEC.  (Terry Shannon of Shannon Knows DEC
fame may have more info in comp.sys.dec.  He always does 8-)

I spent most of my time in the PDP11 and Vax worlds... and research that didn't
come up with a commercial product didn't get into the Field Service rumor
mill.  I seem to remember that there were rumors that this project had
a glass (fiber) backplane and was a screaming multiprocessor system.

I remember that about at this time Cutler bailed to Microsoft.

Perhaps this one his project.  There's Prism docs at the DEC Research
home page...

Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bill Pechter | 17 Meredith Drive Tinton Falls, NJ 07724 | 908-389-3592
 pechter@lakewood.com | Save computing history, give an old geek old hardware.
 This msg brought to you by the letters PDP and the number 11.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709041448.KAA08282>