Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:48:25 -0400
From:      Ryan Kelley <kelleyry@bc.edu>
To:        Alex Popa <razor@ldc.ro>, freebsd-security <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: xinetd versus inetd
Message-ID:  <39B6595C@netfin6.bc.edu>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I could be wrong (it's happened before) but as far as i know the main 
difference is that inetd is subject to DoS attacks, as it will suck up as much 
memory as it wants filling requests. xinetd prevents against this. on a 
semi-related note, where's tcpserver in this equation, and is anyone running 
non-qmail services in tcpserver?
  -ryan

>===== Original Message From Alex Popa <razor@ldc.ro> =====
>Could someone point out what the differences between the two are, and
>why I should use one or the other?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>	Alex
>
>------------+------------------------------------------
>Alex Popa,  |There never was a good war or a bad peace
>razor@ldc.ro|                   -- B. Franklin
>------------+------------------------------------------
>"It took the computing power of three C-64s to fly to the Moon.
>It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here."
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

-- 
Ryan Kelley
kelleyry@bc.edu



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39B6595C>