Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:22:59 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Cc: FreeBSD ARM <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFT: Please help testing the llvm/clang 3.5.0 import Message-ID: <75214DC1-919B-4F96-8052-09AFE283453E@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <21650.55288.425711.209975@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <8598B1D4-5485-426F-B6D6-22BF26AC5FE1@FreeBSD.org> <CAGHfRMBPkQiTgW0Eahkoe1QwArBst-BZ-Lawor_CDda1x8K9xg@mail.gmail.com> <D9C5A8D1-2158-4B37-9C9C-067A4DDE6E44@FreeBSD.org> <21650.55288.425711.209975@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_F8E895ED-1245-483D-9B18-946ECE5EC863 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Dec 18, 2014, at 6:34 AM, owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org wrote: >=20 >=20 > Dimitry Andric writes: >=20 >>> - Could a "MK_CLANG_ALL_TARGETS" or something similar option be >>> added to src.opts.mk to fine tune this process for those of us who >>> don't want to build a cross-compile toolchain every iteration for = our >>> target MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH? >>=20 >> I would be fine with something like this, as long as it is turned off = by >> default, or if it is only used for the bootstrap stages. It is = actually >> an extremely useful feature of clang that you can target multiple >> architectures with one compiler binary. >=20 > Point of information: this seems useful for developers, and > (almost entirely) useless for everyone else. Are there other > cohorts that want this badly? > If that's correct, and there's a simple switch for > configuration ... why should this default to what's useful for the > (much?) smaller number of people? About what am I ignorant? Only people working on a single binary of clang to build all = architectures are interested, which is a vanishingly small number. There=E2=80=99s = little point to build this stuff even for hard-core developers. Warner --Apple-Mail=_F8E895ED-1245-483D-9B18-946ECE5EC863 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUkuNDAAoJEGwc0Sh9sBEA0SYP/1bzvZlk7++0nOuSqprYl7/g hpy3cLx/hqdPE+g7fWBdMYQhzLs0Rd8OfLW4qQ/h1W8iwoz8s8KzqCyDAJoaTbf/ lP+VvjDTy7T9dj7bqyMjdjseY11VpxLOremJABuoV+UAv68uVCg49MdKI9FIjZcM +WAvA8Of0L4xkxcvsA+CU1uqamI2BAylyh7AvHCdHhs0EC7bUg+d+oWPEvpOpcq8 9FBpC+uIwBXI5ZHaHubclYhamzCT+63sQzY7J4h5awsafmFAi0LySXZEhPYdQC+L uAqDOT1i5h4dcCI5NJx97yDqgpdNCSjCq3ckgBx2ZzmFBERB17m+KfmaMYRupM47 mqegwzvPTJ6CsduJnBCth88YmryB36JmW86Jy+Gn8oXd2nSiFeIROgjyVWb5eg7J lLrMHo8bajWkgsiTpN7yWcLqjDD3FY1M4rftVp+NBfhG/qhCBxmO0hymHqKOJajG 6elDIs+yWdddcPoTd4UiyxWGPRqvQqGxQb/VsDcHwUD/s0nQ8EAI/hlQMcT8HhsG rRovEoIlM4mr8IekQtmNbm++PKxhDe79xBxn4L7sp4GuKHIO+QR4hd9OyYwIvYxF T46ZLkmxXuDDkI53Wq6bnFLNiA6n2YHIwzWkCe15vBbAtU/AMLH5gnhXI9cK3dpA ffRtYAS+n7S6Wd3EVxdy =zJx1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_F8E895ED-1245-483D-9B18-946ECE5EC863--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75214DC1-919B-4F96-8052-09AFE283453E>