Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:41:22 +0100 (MET) From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" <gwk@racer.dkrz.de> To: ulf@pbinet.com Cc: coredump@nervosa.com, darrenr@cyber.com.au, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ide problems Message-ID: <199602201641.RAA03856@racer.dkrz.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960220070434.2988A-100000@bitch.Lamb.net> (message from Ulf Zimmermann on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 07:06:07 -0800 (PST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 07:06:07 -0800 (PST)
> From: Ulf Zimmermann <ulf@pbinet.com>
> X-Sender: ulf@bitch.Lamb.net
> Cc: Darren Reed <darrenr@cyber.com.au>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
> Precedence: bulk
>
> I have a Compudyne system in the company with a 200 MB connor (I think,
> will look that up later). This system is giving the same error message
> each night. Looks like at the time of the security check. Have not seen
> that at other times. But the system is not much used at the moment.
>
> Ulf.
>
> ...
>
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 1996, Darren Reed wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > how do I solve this ?
> > >
> > > wd0: interrupt timeout:
> > > wd0: status 58<seekdone,drq> error 0
> > > wd0: interrupt timeout:
> > > wd0: status 50<seekdone> error 1<no_dam>
> > >
> > > 2.1.0-RELEASE/Pentium-100
> > >
> >
Well, I also see it, occasionally. Doesn't seem to do any harm. Or
does it? Please alert me if I should be concerned.
Regards,
Georg-W. Koltermann, gwk@cray.com
Feb 15 13:37:51 anaconda login: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyv0
Feb 15 13:37:51 anaconda login: login on ttyv0 as root
Feb 15 16:05:41 anaconda /kernel: wd1: interrupt timeout:
Feb 15 16:05:43 anaconda /kernel: wd1: status 58<seekdone,drq> error 0
Feb 16 12:21:52 anaconda /kernel: pid 1309: xlock: uid 0: exited on signal 8
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602201641.RAA03856>