Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:25:25 +0000 From: Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <40042A05.60009@cream.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401130848100.5641-100000@pancho> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401130848100.5641-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote: >>That's quite a problem, because how can we inform normal users about new >>features that will be included, if developers don't tell "anyobody" they >>are working on those features? > > Also, the previous attempt tried to include a paragraph about > every project every month. If there's no report, there's no > reason to try to spend time trying to make the developers submit > one, and then trying to edit that up for consistency with the others. > > All just IMHO: quick and often are going to trump slow and > methodical. Personally I think that Scott's bi-monthly reports have been great in the past and seeing as he's willing to continue doing them (see his recent post) I think it's important that any new effort compliments his and doesn't overlap too much. Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40042A05.60009>