Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:38:52 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, bmah@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_linker.c src/sys/boot/common help.common loader.8 module.c Message-ID: <20030305073852.GC60356@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <20030304150207.GA21373@sunbay.com> References: <200303032253.h23MrZ4F038178@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030304005242.GA38799@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030304092528.GA76504@sunbay.com> <20030304134603.GL48337@starjuice.net> <20030304150207.GA21373@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2003/03/04 17:02), Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I thought the whole point of continuing to load modules from /modules in > > 5.x was to give host adminsitrators a sensible place to put 3rd party > > modules, so that they wouldn't be blown away by the installkernel and > > reinstallkernel targets. > > > > I understand why you want /modules to go away, but the onus is on you to > > replace it with something, because it had a purpose. > > > > So, what are you offering in its place? :-) > > > According to hier(7), it's now called /boot/modules. Thanks, Ruslan. That addresses my concerns. I really appreciate your ability to answer a question like that without getting defensive. Bruce, do you have a moment to update the release notes section "2.1.2 Bootloader Changes" to reflect that a) 3rd party modules should be placed in /boot/modules/, and b) such modules designed for use with previous releases of FreeBSD are likely to panic and should be used with extreme caution. ? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-src" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030305073852.GC60356>