Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:54:25 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More request for feedback. Message-ID: <201301102254.r0AMsPaQ094085@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:48:23 CST." <50ECB047.4030503@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen M wrote > Based on responses so far, I am assuming that no-one is using > ctm-cvs-cur any more. So I feel safe about deleting this in late > February. Fine. ( I was keeping quite, still using CVS & thus ctm-cvs-cur, cos I hadn't got round to trying svn from local repository for replacements for eg cvs -R export -r RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE src cvs -R export -r RELEASE_9_1_0 ports cvs -R export -r RELEASE_9_1_0 doc (maybe others were similarly lurking ?) Syntax examples would be welcome. > Is anyone still using ctm-src-4 or ctm-src-5? I'm still subscribed & scripts in place to update trees on every ctm stream, but though I dont have any FreeBSD-5 boxes. I do have >= 3 boxes with FreeBSD-4 that won't easily upgrade but yes: > Note that src-5 hasn't changed for three years, and src-4 for even > longer. (The updates on 9/23/2012 were just header changes due to > switching from cvs to svn.) Tracking 4 & 5 is a moot procedure, it might as well stop if consuming needed resources. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201301102254.r0AMsPaQ094085>