Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:38:57 +0200 From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys" Message-ID: <c/bsZ0e9iU@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <20090731173636.GA76357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20090731121249.538ea7e7.jasonh@DataIX.net> <20090731173636.GA76357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <4A740679.1020608@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hallo Matthew Seaman, > The OP does have a valid point though. I just got an e-mail from Freshpo= > rts > saying that a bunch of ports I maintain had had PORTREVISION bumps becaus= > e of > the jpeg update. Which is all fine and dandy, except that these were the= > =20 > www/p5-RT-* extension modules for RT. First of all, they are pure perl: = > there's > no object linkage with the jpeg shlibs at all. Secondly, they have nothi= > ng > to do with manipulating jpeg data in any way, shape or form. One of thei= > r > dependencies links against libjpeg: that's it. This may be, but the port has "libjpeg" as dependency listed. ports/www/p5-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth$ make all-depends-list | grep jpeg /usr/ports/graphics/jpeg ports/www/p5-RT-Extension-SLA$ make all-depends-list | grep jpeg /usr/ports/graphics/jpeg Sorry I had no way to detect if this dependecy is not needed. I build the index with "EXPLICIT_PACKAGE_DEPENDS=yes", which reduced the number of ports affected alot. Sadly further work on this general problem has been suspended. I hoped the current package tools where up to the task, making this bump obsolete, but I have been prooven wrong. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/errorlogs/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c/bsZ0e9iU>