Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:01:16 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk> To: Peter Losher <plosher@plosh.net> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bind9 and CVE-2013-4854 Message-ID: <20130730090115.GK84587@droso.dk> In-Reply-To: <46029EF7-D574-4953-AE8D-4BA79F5295BB@plosh.net> References: <20130726230549.GB64252@lonrach.local> <CAMCLrkF8u-UmMnfG9=RkGMWYZn%2BL4vK7Mg1XW_pa9HbdLx4r8w@mail.gmail.com> <20130727085458.GB68862@lonrach.local> <46029EF7-D574-4953-AE8D-4BA79F5295BB@plosh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:06:09AM -0700, Peter Losher wrote: > On 27 Jul 2013, at 1:54, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > According to Mark Boolootian: > >> Thank you very much for that. Does this include the RRL/RPZ patches? > > > > The -P1 patch seems to apply and run on the -P2 version (security > > patch is very isolated to one line). > > Note that this week ISC have announced going forward that RRL will be > integrated into the mainline BIND releases. > > Re: > http://www.isc.org/blogs/isc-adds-ddos-defense-module-to-bind-software/ > > So the need for patches for RRL will be a moot point soon??? ;) > That's good news indeed, thanks for the pointer Peter. Erwin -- Erwin Lansing (o_ _o) http://droso.dk \\\_\ /_/// erwin@lansing.dk <____) (____>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130730090115.GK84587>