Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:19:13 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Kenneth Culver <culverk@alpha.yumyumyum.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT Message-ID: <20020315141913.D63986@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020315165304.O30658-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org>; from culverk@alpha.yumyumyum.org on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:54:59PM -0500 References: <3C922C0B.AC440E75@mindspring.com> <20020315165304.O30658-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:54:59PM -0500, Kenneth Culver wrote: > > At the risk of being yelled at, I have a question: Why do we still need to > support a.out? I know that a lot of people MIGHT still have some a.out > binaries lying around, but FreeBSD's default binary format has been ELF > for 3 or 4 years (Since 3.0-3.1 I believe). I'm not saying that we should > entirely switch over to the regular gnu toolchain, but is it really > necessary to keep supporting a.out? Just my $0.02 Rather than offer $0.02, send the patch. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020315141913.D63986>