Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:55:52 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johan_Str=F6m?= <johan@stromnet.se> Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Smartarray P400i and raid5? Message-ID: <E13583FC-F318-4A96-9140-7EB313974D02@ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <F641EDFA-1DA1-4D86-81EB-DA77C1CE2768@stromnet.se> References: <F641EDFA-1DA1-4D86-81EB-DA77C1CE2768@stromnet.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 14.03.2008 um 22:30 schrieb Johan Str=F6m: > Hello list! > > I'm about to get myself a DL360 G5 box with a SmartArray P400i =20 > 256Mb BBWC. I found this thread in the archive: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-proliant/2007-August/=20 > 000297.html > > =46rom the thread one person claims raid5 mode is not very good =20 > without BBWC, but the original poster didn't seem to know if he had =20= > BBWC or not, and the thread died, I'd like to know if this is the =20 > case? > Will raid5 be a bad option on 4x 136Gb 10krpm SAS drives? Main =20 > workload is mysql/apache. > > I've already asked in stable- without a single negative response =20 > (very nice!), but anyone had problems with the 360G5 and FreeBSD 7/=20 > ULE? Any hickups or anything (if you already responded in stable- =20 > then ignore the question :)). > > We run a lot of FreeBSD on HP, but currently there's only one system =20 with FreeBSD7 and it has not been put into production. All the other stuff is on various levels of RELENG_6. We don't see problems. cheers, Rainer --=20 Rainer Duffner CISSP, LPI, MCSE rainer@ultra-secure.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E13583FC-F318-4A96-9140-7EB313974D02>