Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:41:25 +0900
From:      Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>
To:        JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/93422: Re: ipfw divert rule
Message-ID:  <ygebqwx856i.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
In-Reply-To: <200602240630.53797.joao@matik.com.br>
References:  <200602200300.k1K30TZr050863@freefall.freebsd.org> <200602201721.50781.joao@matik.com.br> <ygelkw58dl9.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <200602240630.53797.joao@matik.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

>>>>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:30:53 -0300
>>>>> JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> said:

joao> so would something as

joao> ipfw add 1000 divert 8669 dst-ip 0.0.0.0 src-ip 0.0.0.0

joao> work than? 

It should work.

joao> How should I rewrite my rules or better regressing to the old "ip from any to 
joao> any" ?

It should work as expected, too.  You need to pay attention to the use
of `ip', `ipv4' and `ipv6' with `proto' keyword.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygebqwx856i.wl%ume>