Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:20:21 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed chage to sbuf semantics. Message-ID: <200101111520.f0BFKLs29913@aslan.scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "11 Jan 2001 16:11:00 %2B0100." <xzphf3615vf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>"Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> writes: >> One other point. It would be nice if the return values were in the >> errno style unless you believe that the only error that can ever be >> returned indicates that an overflow occurred. > >All the possible error conditions are documented in the man page. >Please read it. Note I said "ever". Should the implementation change, the reason for failure may also change. Simply updating the man page in this case won't automatically update the code that uses the interface. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101111520.f0BFKLs29913>