Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:28:25 -0230 From: "Jonathan Anderson" <jonathan@FreeBSD.org> To: "Ed Maste" <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org" <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: LLDB build failure Message-ID: <0EFCC62F-4523-49D7-9DEB-20CF8F939239@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2BG6DtMKa12pMbyiqfh1eLyvTnihF30QYxU5BoMH7S60w@mail.gmail.com> References: <F9649E8C-3371-47AC-93EE-0F107F4B8C3D@FreeBSD.org> <CAPyFy2BG6DtMKa12pMbyiqfh1eLyvTnihF30QYxU5BoMH7S60w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 Jul 2016, at 18:07, Ed Maste wrote: > On 19 July 2016 at 13:40, Jonathan Anderson <jonathan@freebsd.org> > wrote: >> Hello toolchain@, >> >> When building a recent (r275944) LLDB on stable/11, I've encountered >> build >> failures in tools/lldb-mi (missing symbol llvm_regexec, need to link >> against >> LLVMSupport). This problem doesn't occur on (at least) OS X, so >> perhaps the >> LLVM build bots don't see it. > > We have a FreeBSD 11 LLDB build bot, which was green as of r272672: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-amd64-ninja-freebsd11 > although I'm not certain exactly what it tests. I build regularly on > my stable/10 desktop though and lldb-mi built successfully. I'm attempting to build with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON... could that explain the difference? Should I expect that configuration to work? It has a dramatic effect on build times for LLVM-based tools. Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0EFCC62F-4523-49D7-9DEB-20CF8F939239>