Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:52:39 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: 80 hour OOo builds Message-ID: <20060128045238.GA75616@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060128.133922.74679311.chat95@mac.com> References: <20060127224922.GA68059@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060128.133922.74679311.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 01:39:22PM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: > In Message-ID: <20060127224922.GA68059@xor.obsecurity.org>=20 > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: >=20 > > Currently the package cluster has a time limit of 80 hours (3 1/3 > > days) for package builds..and openoffice.org 2.0 is exceeding this > > repeatedly. Is it really supposed to take this long? Hardware is p3 > > 800 MHz. >=20 > you can see how long it takes:=20 > http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/benchmark.html > I don't test it for recent milestones, but typically 10h or > so with my Pentium4 2.4G, some ccache hit. I think it took too long. I suspect it might be looping infinitely (maybe due to malloc issues?). I saw a .core file in /tmp, but didn't investigate - if it happens again I'll try to look harder. Kris --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD2viWWry0BWjoQKURAmziAJ9VY7N42KNqFuWSrS9mOh6wYgMvUQCfahxI wuFCc/t/FYoT9mU9whQ38wo= =sYJk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060128045238.GA75616>