Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:29:36 -0800 From: Nerius Landys <nlandys@gmail.com> To: Ed Flecko <edflecko@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I use the standard-supfile or stable-supfile? Message-ID: <AANLkTimVtswTX1CijDKoBzGOpjS8QMvVdhYjGAPJJafU@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimmRcO2HLaZQ1SX9kmeByi-6VhiqdZHmJvhhvmD@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimmRcO2HLaZQ1SX9kmeByi-6VhiqdZHmJvhhvmD@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi everyone, > I've installed Production Release 8.1 on a production server and I > want to just track the errata branch, so should I use the > standard-supfile or stable-supfile? > > Also, I want my supfile to read: tag=RELENG_8_1 > > right? > > You want standard-supfile for the security fixes for your release. For example on my 8.0 system: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8_0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimVtswTX1CijDKoBzGOpjS8QMvVdhYjGAPJJafU>