Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 18:19:40 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To port or not to port Message-ID: <20030518011940.GU31083@vectors.cx> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20030518005944.030b7440@popserver.sfu.ca> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20030518005944.030b7440@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> (05.17.2003 @ 1709 PST): Colin Percival said, in 0.6K: << > Is there any general rule for when code should be an independent port > vs. when it should be included in a different port? > For the next version of security/freebsd-update I've written a binary > diff/patch tool; it can certainly be used on its own, but I think it's most > important user will be freebsd-update. > Should I submit this as a separate port, or just build it as part of > freebsd-update? >> end of "To port or not to port" from Colin Percival << If they may get updated independently, or if people may want one without the other, take a look at the structure of sysutils/cdrtools and sysutils/mkisofs. # Adam - -- Adam Weinberger vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx FreeBSD.org << adamw@FreeBSD.ORG #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+xt+so8KM2ULHQ/0RAobMAJsGEcULu0EtweTWKFv4LBVm2mopmwCfbSMo aBzNERUjSl+QoOTN6bBcP9I= =OqZ2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030518011940.GU31083>