Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:12:18 +0300 From: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com> To: Milan Obuch <freebsd-current@dino.sk> Cc: Maxim Khitrov <max@mxcrypt.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE? Message-ID: <CAE-mSOLXUyCyFCzEzBuqXe0H_tpSet8m6dcBy66_ujUH9OSAAw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20111201072040.7c76ba2d@atom.dino.sk> References: <20111126084402.1afbfc16@atom.dino.sk> <CAE-mSOK-ZNr2kY9NYCe0R-=B9tdPWrX8AFTkhWVtZxZU0Gz94A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJcQMWccSET4zrodAED54Du1na_d1O2nbQ_JTwx8e3gAHUHtOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-mSOKxd3j8FQVobpHf%2Bpz5a02rquRJxMRE_GZ7vH5QbVETKw@mail.gmail.com> <20111201072040.7c76ba2d@atom.dino.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current@dino.sk> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 > Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov <max@mxcrypt.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov >> > <pluknet@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current@dino.sk> >> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source >> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying >> >>> what to csup >> >>> >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 >> >>> >> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just >> >>> >> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile >> >>> >> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config >> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two >> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to >> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older >> >>> version sources. >> >>> >> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make >> >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version... >> >>> >> >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I >> >>> think this line should already be changed to new tag... >> >>> >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 >> >> >> >> Hi. >> >> >> >> Fixed. Thanks for your report. >> >> Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. >> > >> > Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm >> > using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points >> > to HEAD. >> >> Yep, sure. >> I just sent a request to the Release Engineering Team. >> > > It works for me now as expected, thanks. > > Anyway, there is a question what the difference between stable-supfile > and standard-supfile should be. I looked in my local csupped sources, > they are the same in 6-STABLE (OK, some history here), 7-STABLE, > 8-STABLE and 9-STABLE. Are they expected to be used differently? In STABLE branches standard-supfile and stable-supfile are used to have the same cvs tag. FYI, compare how it is done in RELEASE branches. > And, second one - what about CURRENT? In stable-supfile I see > tag=RELENG_9 which is not quite clear, but just for some pedantry... I > use standard-supfile for CURRENT, so this is not an issue for me either. To my knowledge, in CURRENT a standard-supfile's cvs tag should be read as "the latest (i.e. the most recently created) stable branch". -- wbr, pluknet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAE-mSOLXUyCyFCzEzBuqXe0H_tpSet8m6dcBy66_ujUH9OSAAw>