Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:32:51 +0200 From: Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com> To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275 Message-ID: <AANLkTikibbYCV9Vig63xaH2GVwY9OgxE6g=45CZHHPrV@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86d3s57ult.fsf@gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinNPgm5pJS-OY28t5fScwtv%2BKHg-rXeBMqJd9Ht@mail.gmail.com> <86tylij8pu.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTik_xfuhgrZ1%2BHyGkB7UJEq5qWdvtGx3tK%2BuAiha@mail.gmail.com> <86tylh7uxv.fsf@gmail.com> <86d3s57ult.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Double answer: The functions you see in amulecmd should be in wxbase and wx is not a problem. My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd, and I think this can be done in amule calling configure like described in this howto http://wiki.amule.org/index.php/HowTo_Compile_aMuled So, I think a knob for passing to configure those flags would do the job. This way X11 should not be needed. Paolo 2010/9/22 Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> > Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> writes: > > > Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule? > > > > No, even without --disable-monolithic amule would still require WX. > ^^^ > Typo: without -> with. > > Perhaps, I misinterpreted your question and you just don't want to build > `amule' while still having WX dependency. It's easy to provide a knob > for monolithic. Do you need it? > -- ----------------------- Paolo Bormida Giaveno - Torino ----------------------- Italy -----------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikibbYCV9Vig63xaH2GVwY9OgxE6g=45CZHHPrV>