Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:50:34 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Definition of NULL Message-ID: <20090505035034.GH3417@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <200905041046.02920.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <d41814900905020859q4faff431p8819aaf38dfe9e78@mail.gmail.com> <200905041046.02920.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:46:02AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > I think this would be ok to let C++ work in the kernel. "Embedded" C++ (no > exceptions and no dynamic_cast<>) should work fine in theory. I would not > change the value of NULL that userland sees though as I think that may be too > risky. Well, use __null if present all the time, fallback to the alternatives as currently defined. Joerg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090505035034.GH3417>