Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:32:12 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org>, Ken Smith <kensmith@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r188439 - head/release Message-ID: <4991BA1C.4020209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1234279584.65150.13.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> References: <200902101511.n1AFBQXx096922@svn.freebsd.org> <9bbcef730902100717x1cd1118bg1d2683a42a25232@mail.gmail.com> <1234279584.65150.13.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'd argue -j2 is appropriate, given that it is reasonable to assume most of the user base still have uniprocessor systems. I have only one dual-core box, and -j2 will still cause at least one make(1) child process to run at any given time on each core -- it seems like the right compromise.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4991BA1C.4020209>