Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 15:46:40 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, FreeBSD Current <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles Message-ID: <20000514154640.Q82488@argon.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <200005141925.e4EJPHN32617@orthanc.ab.ca>; from lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca on Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:25:16PM -0600 References: <20000514150714.J82488@argon.blackdawn.com> <200005141925.e4EJPHN32617@orthanc.ab.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:25:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for > SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris): > > -l load > Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started > if there are others jobs running and the load average > is at least load (a floating-point number). With no > argument, removes a previous load limit. > > Maybe this should instead be a -d sub-option? > > And I like the idea of adding the -l functionality described above. Ok, what do other people think? I mean, it'd be easy to change the flag to use this feature. -dl seems fine for this particular feature. -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000514154640.Q82488>