Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:55:51 +0200 From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> To: "R. Scott Evans" <freebsd-ports@rsle.net>, Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> Cc: timur@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tdb Message-ID: <54B92677.4020407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54B9248B.9080104@rsle.net> References: <54B92146.3060901@rsle.net> <09128b642757896623c9f03b0be63d6f@thebighonker.lerctr.org> <54B9248B.9080104@rsle.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2015-01-16 16:47, R. Scott Evans wrote: > On 01/16/15 09:39, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> On 2015-01-16 08:33, R. Scott Evans wrote: >>> Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-) >>> >>> # pkg version -IvL= >>> tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4) >>> >>> -scott >> the ,1 is the PORTEPOCH which apparently was changed because of a >> version number regression. > > Well, I mention it because while I use "pkg version -IvL=", I know the > FreeBSD Handbook section on updating ports instructs one to use 'pkg > version -l "<"' which will cause this ports change to go unseen. > Likewise, "portmaster -a" on my box didn't catch this and I had to > specifically update/downgrade the port. Folks, the relevant diff here is [1]; it reverted PORTEPOCH from 1 to 0. And you're right, it's a bug, since PORTEPOCH should never ever decrease. [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/databases/tdb/Makefile?r1=377150&r2=377149
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54B92677.4020407>