Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 07:39:54 +0100 From: Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk> To: dyson@iquest.net Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp), hasty@rah.star-gate.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Here is what I promised :-) Message-ID: <E0yo0Gg-00007d-00.qmail@myrddin.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: "John S. Dyson"'s message of "Sun, 21 Jun 1998 17:45:09 -0500 (EST)" References: <199806212245.RAA07936@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"John S. Dyson" <dyson@iquest.net> writes: > Maybe, but I *am* working on a scalable and forward looking kernel > that will perform about the same as a conventional kernel, except > where the conventional kernel doesn't perform well at all. The > abstractions that we are working on, work both on PC's, on SMP > PC's, multiple machines (acting essentially as one machine), and > even heterogeneous machines (in a limited fashion.) Got it! You're working on FreePlan9. :-) -- "Remember the Golden Rule: he who has the gold makes the rules" -- WoID To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0yo0Gg-00007d-00.qmail>