Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 10:35:22 +0200 From: Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> Cc: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.2-RELEASE '875 SCSI won't negotiage Message-ID: <19971025103522.51922@mi.uni-koeln.de> In-Reply-To: <199710212347.QAA09208@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>; from Don Lewis on Tue, Oct 21, 1997 at 04:47:42PM -0700 References: <se@FreeBSD.ORG> <199710212347.QAA09208@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1997-10-21 16:47 -0700, Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> wrote: > On Oct 22, 12:13am, Stefan Esser wrote: > } > > > sd0(ncr0:0:0): WIDE SCSI (16 bit) enabled > } > > > sd0(ncr0:0:0): 20.0 MB/s (100 ns, offset 16) > } If 40MB/s is reported, you still won't be able to get > } more than some 37MB/s moved, actually, but well, it is > } the number claimed by the drive and controller vendors, > } and so it can't be wrong to report it :) > > But isn't this misleading if it's only connected to narrow devices? Sure, it was, if that number was printed for a narrow device. But it of course isn't: This is a per device message, and a narrow device would have 20MB/s in its attach message (while actually being limited to some 18.5MB/s). Regards, STefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971025103522.51922>