Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Oct 2005 14:05:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
To:        jpp@cloudview.com
Cc:        stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
Message-ID:  <200510081805.j98I5xNB036286@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <43476167.7030805@cloudview.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <43476167.7030805@cloudview.com>, jpp@cloudview.com writes:

>My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine  it's
>saying "sk0 watchdog timeout" after a day or so of operation - temp
>fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but
>functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues.  
>What works for you?

I have machines with Tigon II (ti), Marvell 88E8001 (sk), i82540 (em),
RTL8169 (re), and BCM5750 (bge) interfaces.  The only ones I've ever
had problems with were the Tigon and Marvell, and the latter was fixed
nearly a year ago.  All except the Tigon and Broadcom are running
under 5-STABLE; the Broadcom is running 6.0b5.

I can't comment on the Level I, Nominal Semidestructor, or VIA chips
as I've never seen any.

-GAWollman

-- 
Garrett A. Wollman    | As the Constitution endures, persons in every
wollman@csail.mit.edu | generation can invoke its principles in their own
Opinions not those    | search for greater freedom.
of MIT or CSAIL.      | - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510081805.j98I5xNB036286>