Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Sep 2001 16:44:50 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@clickarray.com>
To:        portmgr@freebsd.org
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   (forw) ports lock patch
Message-ID:  <20010905164450.X10474@dune.clickarray.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Forwarded message from Alfred Perlstein <alfred@clickarray.com> -----

From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@clickarray.com>
To: Satoshi Asami <asami@clickarray.com>
Subject: ports lock patch
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:17:27 -0700
Message-ID: <20010905151727.T10474@dune.clickarray.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

have a look at this will you?  it uses lockf to prevent multiple
builds from recursing into the same port at the same time, it's
really nice when doing a fresh install because you can safely
build multiple ports that have the same dependancies without
worrying about an explosion.

http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/ports-lock.diff

It would also allow you to parallelize the ports/packages building
a lot better on the cluster.

Shall I clean it up and commit it?


-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010905164450.X10474>