Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Nov 1997 03:52:16 +1030
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: >64MB 
Message-ID:  <199711061722.DAA00364@word.smith.net.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Nov 1997 07:40:21 CDT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.971106073452.7018C-100000@picnic.mat.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 6 Nov 1997, Mike Smith wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > Speaking of vm86(), why not just use real-mode?  It's easier and much
> > > better for compatibility while booting.
> > 
> > How do you copy the kernel into memory > 1M in real mode?  If you could
> > elaborate on this (and how to *stay* in real mode while running over 
> > 1M, ie. so that the kzip pass and subsequent real-mode startup 
> > requirements could be met), I'd be *very*happy*
> 
> Huh?  Is that the limitation? 

That's ths crux.  That and the fact that our toolchain doesn't generate 
real-mode code very well, so what we produce runs best in protected 
mode.  We just drop back to real mode to call the BIOS.

Check the boot sources for a better picture of what goes on; if you 
have any ideas, we're always open.  8)

mike





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711061722.DAA00364>