Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:26:33 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux gnome libraries etc. Message-ID: <39615478@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080216115948.485afc1d@deskjail> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Sat\, 16 Feb 2008 11\:59\:48 %2B0100") References: <20080213224717.GA59146@freebsd.org> <53884346@ipt.ru> <20080214091408.GA82434@freebsd.org> <43157302@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <20080214194358.5cjdxcll0gook8o8@webmail.leidinger.net> <96741075@bs1.sp34.ru> <20080216115948.485afc1d@deskjail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:59:48 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > I expect more problems for people which try to update without reading > UPDATING, and I expect that there need to be some additional logic in > bsd.port.mk. Plist handling and other things may be more messy. How do plan to introduce 2.6 as a default? First at HEAD, then MFC it or just leave it for 8.x only? > BTW: I don't like to have f7 or such in the port names, I think k26 > (like kernel 2.6) or 26e (like 2.6 emulation) would be better in the > long term. I like the latter. What about 26ke (2.6 kernel emulation)? Although it's one character longer... WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39615478>