Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:30:46 -0400
From:      Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r263186 - in head: . tools/tools/nanobsd
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxgknCr%2B%2BJHPUMcW39wdmd_HvJxGrU%2BGYdhTkLeeesfTZYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201403141945.s2EJjfHS055894@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201403141945.s2EJjfHS055894@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 March 2014 15:45, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: imp
> Date: Fri Mar 14 19:45:40 2014
> New Revision: 263186
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/263186
>
> Log:
>   With the more generous footprints today, it makes little sense to use
>   UFS1 by default any more. Switch to UFS2.
>
> Modified:
>   head/Makefile.inc1
>   head/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh
>
> Modified: head/Makefile.inc1
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/Makefile.inc1  Fri Mar 14 19:45:32 2014        (r263185)
> +++ head/Makefile.inc1  Fri Mar 14 19:45:40 2014        (r263186)
> @@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ CROSSENV+=  GROFF_BIN_PATH=${WORLDTMP}/le
>                 GROFF_FONT_PATH=${WORLDTMP}/legacy/usr/share/groff_font \
>                 GROFF_TMAC_PATH=${WORLDTMP}/legacy/usr/share/tmac
>  .endif
> +.if defined(TARGET_CFLAGS)
> +CROSSENV+=     ${TARGET_CFLAGS}
> +.endif
>
>  # bootstrap-tools stage
>  BMAKEENV=      INSTALL="sh ${.CURDIR}/tools/install.sh" \
>
> Modified: head/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh Fri Mar 14 19:45:32 2014        (r263185)
> +++ head/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh Fri Mar 14 19:45:40 2014        (r263186)
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ NANO_CUSTOMIZE=""
>  NANO_LATE_CUSTOMIZE=""
>
>  # Newfs paramters to use
> -NANO_NEWFS="-b 4096 -f 512 -i 8192 -O1 -U"
> +NANO_NEWFS="-b 4096 -f 512 -i 8192 -O2 -U"

Perhaps it makes sense to drop -O and just rely on newfs's default?

-- 
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgknCr%2B%2BJHPUMcW39wdmd_HvJxGrU%2BGYdhTkLeeesfTZYQ>