Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:26:44 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doceng@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: doc/ slush begins Message-ID: <4E714644.20803@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGroGP12AwH-pdLi4qZrCEkphfEw9=9Q1gQ0bJfYvFdA%2BXieCg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110808121545.GA3004@emphyrio.blackend.org> <20110823194633.GA1977@emphyrio.blackend.org> <20110907191534.GA1963@emphyrio.blackend.org> <20110909194744.GD1974@emphyrio.blackend.org> <4E705BC8.7050305@FreeBSD.org> <CAGroGP12AwH-pdLi4qZrCEkphfEw9=9Q1gQ0bJfYvFdA%2BXieCg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/14/2011 06:20, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > 2011/9/14 Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>: >> On 09/09/2011 12:47, Marc Fonvieille wrote: >>> The doc tree has been tagged for 9.0-RELEASE. >> >> Out of curiosity, why was it tagged so early in the release process? >> Given past history it's likely we're a long ways from an actual release >> date. >> > > Docs are now distributed via packages, so doc packages must be > committed and the distfiles propagated before the build of RELEASE > packages which occurs just before RC1. > According to the release schedule we are not so early, of course the > dates are slipping but I prefer to be conservative and ready. I'll > try to redo a new version of doc packages before RC1 if a lot of new > valuable things are added to the doc tree and if the real schedule > allows it. Makes sense, thanks. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E714644.20803>