Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:53:54 -0800 From: J Turner <jamwt@jamwt.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference) Message-ID: <20020221185354.A50908@stan.jamwt.com> In-Reply-To: <20020219180004.GO12136@elvis.mu.org>; from bright@mu.org on Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:00:04AM -0800 References: <20020219092058.A78717@host213-123-131-110.in-addr.bto> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10202190914510.25289-100000@cranford> <20020219175431.A12535@host213-123-131-110.in-addr.bto> <20020219180004.GO12136@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:00:04AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Disk IO can't be done in a non-blocking manner. If the kernel doesn't > have the portion of the file you wish to read in the buffer cache > then the process will block waiting. Isn't this exactly what the kqueue mechanism circumvents? I'm soooo confused.... - Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020221185354.A50908>