Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:04:55 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 64850 for review
Message-ID:  <200411111704.56002.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200411102327.iAANRIUk056825@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200411102327.iAANRIUk056825@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 06:27 pm, Peter Wemm wrote:
> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=64850
>
> Change 64850 by peter@peter_daintree on 2004/11/10 23:26:58
>
> 	kill cpu_reset_proxy stuff, sched_bind() to cpu0 does
> 	it better.

We really should halt other CPUs during shutdown though, maybe send an 
IPI_STOP to all but self after the sched_bind()?

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411111704.56002.jhb>