Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 08:13:35 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Gary Roberts <wangel@wgrobez1.remote.louisville.edu> Cc: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -current stable again? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961015081149.276B-100000@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961014231539.12960A-100000@wgrobez1.remote.louisville.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Oct 1996, Gary Roberts wrote: > On Mon, 14 Oct 1996, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > > > > > I have held off on upgrading because of the recent problems reported by > > Karl and others, but -current seems suspiciously quiet after Saturday. Is > > it safe to use? > > > > > I tried updating pppd to pppd2.3b or whatever, but it broke my kernel > tree. I ended up running a sup to update, everything seems ok, however I > did recieve alot of Warning messages from gcc while compiling a new > kernel. That's gcc 2.7.2.1 .... Remove the Warning -W... ;-) BTW, I removed 'hackers' from the Cc:, because it's a topic for -current. -current people always read -hackers .... Andreas /// __ andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<<
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.961015081149.276B-100000>