Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 May 2001 16:31:17 +0000 (GMT)
From:      "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   brainstorm: "intermediate" disk caching
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.20.0105281619110.5344-100000@www.everquick.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greetings all,

I just had a brainstorm...

I was thinking about database servers with several spindles in a RAID 5
array.  Write performance is inherently disappointing -- which may or may
not be an issue.

Would it be worth the trouble to design an "intermediate" cache, whereby
data are quickly written to a spool disk, then to the final destination?
Sort of like softwares that cache CDROMs on HDD...

My gut feel is that this would be more trouble than it's worth, would not
net any overall performance*reliability (expressed as a product) gain, and
that one might actually realize a p*r decrease.

Comments, flames, larts, and funny stares appreciated.


Eddy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc.
EverQuick Internet Division

Phone: (316) 794-8922

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.20.0105281619110.5344-100000>