Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:14:06 -0600 From: Will Andrews <will@firepipe.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, attilio@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r250411 - in head/sys: conf kern sys Message-ID: <CADBaqmjxss1j-a5HfMJHU5mjt4AsO%2BpzYMJJY=7Ps=1JxrWuVQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201305122149.13566.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201305091628.r49GSI33039873@svn.freebsd.org> <201305101533.26992.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAJ-FndBHD4sLquFcSYERkD2Mfo4iAbjBBuvtdOmp0PrqJE2MrA@mail.gmail.com> <201305122149.13566.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 7:49 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > Also, while LK_NOWITESS works fine for lockmgr's API (it already takes a > flag > argument), having that sort of thing in our other lock APIs is messier > (they > generally do not have flags). This is why a per-thread flag seemed > simpler to > me for this as you don't have to change umpteen locking APIs to add a new > flags field. > Another problem is that approach is far too blunt; in most cases false positive LORs are specific to a particular pair of instances of locks. You'd probably still want to receive witness notifications for other LORs. --Will. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADBaqmjxss1j-a5HfMJHU5mjt4AsO%2BpzYMJJY=7Ps=1JxrWuVQ>