Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:32:45 -0400 From: Richard Kuhns <rjk@wintek.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup broken on amd64? Message-ID: <4E6A076D.7040309@wintek.com> In-Reply-To: <20110909073305.Horde.oi-EGaQd9PdOaaURAsTRVJk@avocado.salatschuessel.net> References: <20110908221356.Horde.MFEsZ6Qd9PdOaSIEaid2X_A@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <4E692F87.5010708@sentex.net> <20110909073305.Horde.oi-EGaQd9PdOaaURAsTRVJk@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/09/11 01:33, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > > Mike Tancsa<mike@sentex.net> wrote: > >> Just curious as to why you need cvsup and not instead use csup that is >> in the base ? > > I got used to it in the past 12 years? But this is not realy the question. > If it is "BROKEN" it should be marked as BROKEN or there should be a > statement that it will not work with FreeBSD 9 on at least amd64 or we > will have other users complaining about the same at least when > 9.0 RELEASE is out - right? I'm also using cvsup again, due to a problem I had with csup back in February 2011 <http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable@freebsd.org/msg114813.html>; . I didn't open a PR; I was under some time pressure and cvsup worked. - Richard -- Richard Kuhns <rjk@wintek.com> My Desk: 765-269-8541 Wintek Corporation Internet Support: 765-269-8503 427 N 6th Street STE C Consulting: 765-269-8504 Lafayette, IN 47901-2211 Accounting: 765-269-8502
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E6A076D.7040309>