Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 11:12:53 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NBQ: Why partitioning? (was: Re: Partitioning suggestions?) Message-ID: <19971122111253.HK34127@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <19971121002001.09565@keltia.freenix.fr>; from Ollivier Robert on Nov 21, 1997 00:20:01 %2B0100 References: <199711180019.TAA01983@dyson.iquest.net> <199711180202.VAA04479@luomat.peak.org> <19971117192532.37475@micron.mini.net> <19971119193141.NY02422@uriah.heep.sax.de> <19971121002001.09565@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Ollivier Robert wrote: > > I wished we would support 16 partition slots at least as an > > alternative to the backwards-compatible 8 slot model. > > Why not using a second FreeBSD slice ? I happen to hate slices, ya know? :-) I wanna be able to use my disk on any potential controller, disregarding any geometry hassles. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971122111253.HK34127>