Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 01:38:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: Jonathan Mini <mini@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 11120 for review Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205190135590.64991-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020519000301.K49505-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Sat, 18 May 2002, Jonathan Mini wrote: > > > Jeff Roberson [jroberson@chesapeake.net] wrote : > > > > > The fini call happens w/o the zone lock being held. > > > > In that case, we haven't any problems with the fini call, except that it > > might be called from the page daemon. Is that a problem? > > > In all likelyhood it will *only* be called from the page daemon. > Are you saying that discarding excess items occurs 'offline' and is done by the paging daemon? i.e. the dissassociation of the thread and its stack doesn't happen in teh calling coext of the uma_zfree(). (?) (no source here) julian > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0205190135590.64991-100000>