Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 08:57:24 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358704 - head/Mk Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmCpgvW7w20Y7sfL5%2B2hDWU=C4OpidV0_AjzndYcBvaTA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201406211423.s5LENFt4010937@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201406211423.s5LENFt4010937@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 June 2014 07:23, Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: adamw > Date: Sat Jun 21 14:23:15 2014 > New Revision: 358704 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/358704 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r358704/ > > Log: > Improve the clarity of a few descriptions that became less accurate by > overspecificity. If the options can't be specific they should not be shared > Modified: > head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk > > -GHOSTSCRIPT_DESC?= Ghostscript PDF support > +GHOSTSCRIPT_DESC?= Ghostscript support This description is now meaningless. Can you propose a better alternative? > -LDAP_DESC?= LDAP authentication support > +LDAP_DESC?= LDAP protocol support What functionality might i gain or lose if I turn this on/off? LDAP should likely not be a shared description at all. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmCpgvW7w20Y7sfL5%2B2hDWU=C4OpidV0_AjzndYcBvaTA>