Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Jun 1998 16:29:33 +0800 (MYT)
From:      Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com>
To:        "Randal S. Masutani" <randal@comtest.com>
Cc:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: I'm back. 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.980627162845.253D-100000@broker>
In-Reply-To: <199806262033.KAA09191@oldyeller.comtest.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Randal S. Masutani wrote:

> 3.0-current sound good, but is it stable enough as compared to 2.2.6R ?
> I plan to run PicoBSD embedded into a commercial test equipment.

my playing around revealed that DEVFS was pretty shaky on a full 2.2.6 
system, let alone picobsd. i wouldnt really recommend it. of course, i 
would love for someone to prove me wrong here.

Regards,                        /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh@alphaque.com             (0 0)
+=======================----oOO--(_)--OOo----=========================+
|for a in past present future; do                                     |
| for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do |
| echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."|
|done; done                                                           |
+=====================================================================+
http://pgp.ai.mit.edu/htbin/pks-extract-key.pl?op=get&search=0x230096E9


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.980627162845.253D-100000>