Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:04:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209458] base OpenSSL complains for relocation for mysql57 Message-ID: <bug-209458-8-ueh0oVYpxK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-209458-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-209458-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209458 Mahdi Mokhtari <mokhi64@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #170235|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #170235|maintainer-approval?(mokhi6 | Flags|4@gmail.com) | Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |mokhi64@gmail.com Status|New |In Progress Attachment #170365| |maintainer-approval+ Flags| | --- Comment #8 from Mahdi Mokhtari <mokhi64@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 170365 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D170365&action= =3Dedit Previous patch (mark port if Base used intentionally) with some changes This is like patch Markus suggested with some changes (to be more exact) Using BROKEN instead of IGNORE: as handbook suggests it's better to "Use BR= OKEN for ports where the problem is believed to be temporary." and i believe it's temporary (as I'm trying to patch the Cmake-script to ma= ke it not use `ld` for static libs and use them to build ;D) Also i see no reason to use .if condition for setting "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3D= yes" as we should set it anyway. BTW, i solved these in this patch. QA: portlint -AC -> done successfully: no Fatal error --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-209458-8-ueh0oVYpxK>