Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jun 1996 17:54:14 +0300 (EET DST)
From:      Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To:        Adam David <adam@veda.is>
Cc:        Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, jmz@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: review: ftpget final source
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960617175041.28271A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
In-Reply-To: <199606171241.MAA09783@veda.is>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Adam David wrote:

> > Not meaning to rain on the parade, but I think ftpget is a bad name now... 
> > One port (squid) installs /usr/local/bin/ftpget, and I dread the confusion 
> > that this may cause....
> > 
> > Also, since it does both ftp and http fetches, ftpget is an increasingly 
> > inappropriate name..  Could we rename it to something like (say) netget..  
> > (I know, that's a boring and uninspiring name...)
> 
> 'fetch' seems to fit, and is easier to pronounce.

Yes, "fetch" sounds better to me aswell - abd there is the fetch target in 
the makefiles, isn't there?

	Sander

> 
> --
> Adam David <adam@veda.is>
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960617175041.28271A-100000>