Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 5 Sep 1998 05:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/etc/mtree BSD.usr.dist src Makefile.inc1 src/usr.bin/vi Makefile src/usr.bin/tclsh Makefile src/lib/libtcl Makefile
Message-ID:  <199809051225.FAA27897@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
asami       1998/09/05 05:25:55 PDT

  Modified files:
    usr.bin              Makefile 
    lib                  Makefile 
    etc/mtree            BSD.usr.dist 
    .                    Makefile.inc1 
    usr.bin/vi           Makefile 
  Removed files:
    usr.bin/tclsh        Makefile 
    lib/libtcl           Makefile 
  Log:
  Remove tcl from /usr/src, according to prior agreement.  BTW, tcl-8.0 *is*
  a port so there is nothing to be done on that side now.
  
  Approved by:	jkh
  ===
  To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
  cc: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, current@freebsd.org
  Subject: Re: Make this a relese coordinator decision (was Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued)
  From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
  Date: Sun, 03 Aug 1997 20:23:31 -0700
  
  >decision is, I'll respect it.
  
     Another chance to architect people's principles...I can hardly wait. Seems
  quite appropriate for a Sunday - I just need to get one of those collection
  plates (and money envelopes) so I can profit, too. :-)
     Tcl stays in /usr/src for now, but it needs to be kept up to date; same
  for perl. If Jordan doesn't have "setup" (written in tcl) ready for 3.0,
  then tcl will be yanked prior to the 3.0 release (and made into a port).
     As for the ports tree only supporting the last FreeBSD release, this seems
  sensible to me. The "ports" have always been a moving target between releases
  and the problem is only going to get worse when we expand to supporting other
  processor architectures. In any case, Satoshi is and always has been in charge
  of the ports tree and whatever he wants to do with it (within reason :-)) is
  his decision.
     Does this cover the issue completely? I admit to deleting messages in this
  thread with unusual fervor (people have FAR too much time on their hands!).
  There's a fair bit of reasoning behind the above, but since everyone is sick
  of arguing about this, I'll spare you the analysis.
  
  -DG
  
  David Greenman
  Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.110     +1 -6      src/usr.bin/Makefile
  1.76      +2 -8      src/lib/Makefile
  1.119     +1 -5      src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist
  1.7       +1 -6      src/Makefile.inc1
  1.23      +2 -4      src/usr.bin/vi/Makefile



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809051225.FAA27897>