Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:58:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net> To: FreeBSD-Java <java@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: JDK 1.2.2 for FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010090954550.3272-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010092239590.99362-100000@4eva.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Kwi-Hyun Choi wrote: > Hello, > > >> Ernst de Haan wrote: > >> ppl say that they use the linu-jdk1.2.2 port because the native FreeBSD > >> JDK is not available as a port yet, and that makes me sad ;-( > > Why ppl use linux-jdk1.2.2 port ? > > I compiled jdk1.2.2 for FreeBSD successfully, although that is not safety. > (by http://java.freebsd.org) > > [masterpc@4eva][~]$ java -version > java version "1.2.2" > Classic VM (build jdk1.2.2-FreeBSD:root:2000/10/06-17:58, green threads, > nojit) ^^^^^ Yuck. If a JIT is available, it speeds things up by a factor of ten (at least, that's my experience on Linux with the LINPACK benchmark. I don't know if the speedup would be as dramatic or not on FreeBSD, what with the current lack of kernel threads--I'm not bitching, mind you, just observing). > Then, I have a question. > > Is there any problem if jdk1.2.2-FreeBSD is available as a port ? > > I think that it's better way to make jdk1.2.2 as a port although it's not > safety. > > Is that wrong ? > > I wanna know that what the problem is. -.-a There may be licensing issues. -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) behanna@zbzoom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010090954550.3272-100000>