Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:45:33 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358722 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20140623124533.GP23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgkeu0BG5pzN1rJ=u=5VnNgmVuN2PWbay13RY7qMt7JCmA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201406211708.s5LH8ZvE087036@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgkeu0BG5pzN1rJ=u=5VnNgmVuN2PWbay13RY7qMt7JCmA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:17:19AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 21 June 2014 10:08, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: mat > > Date: Sat Jun 21 17:08:34 2014 > > New Revision: 358722 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/358722 > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r358722/ > > > > Log: > > Add a small notice about maintainership of this file. > > > > With hat: portmgr > > Sponsored by: Absolight > > > > Modified: > > head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk > > > > Modified: head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > --- head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk Sat Jun 21 17:03:33 2014 (r35872= 1) > > +++ head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk Sat Jun 21 17:08:34 2014 (r35872= 2) > > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > > # - OPTION_DESC?=3D must be 19 characters or less > > # - OPTION description text must be 43 characters or less > > # > > +# - This file's MAINTAINER is ports@FreeBSD.org so that entries can be= added to > > +# it easily. Any sweeping changes should be approved by portmgr. >=20 > IMHO this is silly. The risk of changing description text is almost > zero. Sweeping changes should be reviewed, but I don't think gating > the review on a member of portmgr is useful. >=20 Given what happened recently on those yes portmgr needs to review those swe= ep regards, Bapt --7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOoIW0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyCrwCdGD3q1HaQ9BKRbb1YX1k2NgFP q6EAnjfKdnnJchnMsflv+5lNyxEqCkns =Jafa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140623124533.GP23976>