Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat,  6 May 1995 14:44:25 +0400
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su>
To:        Ed Hudson <elh@p54c.spnet.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: slattach!!!!!!! - solutions
Message-ID:  <UR9CrglyZ2@astral.msk.su>
In-Reply-To: <199505052232.PAA03358@p54c.spnet.com>; from Ed Hudson at Fri, 05 May 1995 15:32:31 -0700
References:  <199505052232.PAA03358@p54c.spnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199505052232.PAA03358@p54c.spnet.com> Ed Hudson writes:


>	2) constant sl-unit number

>	because i have multiple slip connections going simultaneously,
>	i cannot tolerate slattach's normal behaviour of providing
>	unpredictable sl-units (eg, sl1, sl0, sl2, etc).

>	i DO recommend that patch-sys be incorporated in 2.0.5
>	if the unit-controllable slattach isn't ready.

This already done by another way: ioctl SLIOCSUNIT, this way compatible
with BSDI style. Your way is less flexible and non-compatible
with anything.
I DON'T recommend this patch to 2.0.5.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov        : And I rest so composedly,  /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su       : That any beholder  /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3    : Might start at beholding me,  /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team :         E.A.Poe         From "For Annie" 1849



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?UR9CrglyZ2>