Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:36:29 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf 4.1 Update available for testing Message-ID: <4679659D.7050506@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20070620152609.GD26920@void.codelabs.ru> References: <200706160347.33331.max@love2party.net> <20070617094126.GT3779@void.codelabs.ru> <200706171717.21585.max@love2party.net> <20070619074150.GC26920@void.codelabs.ru> <4677FF00.4060506@root.org> <20070620152609.GD26920@void.codelabs.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Nate, good day. > > Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:06:24AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: >>> With my patch the problem goes away. Just checked ;)) >> If this works for you, I'm ok with Max committing it. > > Fine, thanks! So, you're happy with the way the problem was fixed? > I see that another function that uses tbr_callout is tbr_timeout, > but it will not be called before tbr_set. So it seems to me that > callout initialisation only in tbr_set is enough. But maybe I am > missing something? > > Thank you. If you want to trigger the call to callout_init() differently, you could use a SYSINIT that runs before all of altq. Then you would be sure it's always initialized before anything else can run. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4679659D.7050506>