Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:13:01 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock Message-ID: <20030417171301.GA29549@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030417163642.GI23466@survey.codeburst.net> References: <20030414192627.C32D543F3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20030414170306.C70262@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <20030414211310.I5215@hub.org> <20030417163642.GI23466@survey.codeburst.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 05:36:43PM +0100, Paul Richards wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 09:13:54PM +0000, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > > > > Pawel, > > > > > > Last I've heard, SCHED_ULE isn't SMP friendly. > > I haven't been able to build a SCHED_ULE working kernel since 11 April. > It has dies with the blockable sleep lock as per this thread and I've > been trying a new kernel each day but it's still broken. > > I tried to track down the commit and I know it exists in a kernel built > later than 12th but I haven't pinpointed the exact commit yet. > Are your running a UP or SMP system? My laptop and home system are both running a 14 April ULE kernel/world without any problems. Both systems are UP. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030417171301.GA29549>